American University Acceptance Rate, SAT/ACT Scores, GPA

American University is a private research university with an acceptance rate of 32%. Located on 84 park-like acres in the northwest quadrant of Washington, D.C., American University is considered one of the most internationally-engaged universities in the country. The university was chartered by the U.S. Congress in 1893, and it now boasts a student body that comes from over 150 countries. Programs in International Relations, Political Science, and Government are particularly strong, but the universitys general strengths in the arts and sciences have earned it a chapter of  Phi Beta Kappa. The law and business schools also place well in national rankings. On the athletic front, the American University Eagles compete in the NCAA Division I  Patriot League. The university also has the advantage of being near  many other colleges and universities in the Washington D.C. area. Considering applying to American University? Here are the admission statistics you should know, including average SAT/ACT scores and GPAs of admitted students. Acceptance Rate During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, American University had an acceptance rate of 32%. This means that for every 100 students who applied, 32 students were admitted, making American Universitys admissions process competitive. Admissions Statistics (2017-18) Number of Applicants 18,984 Percent Admitted 32% Percent Admitted Who Enrolled (Yield) 29% SAT Scores and Requirements American University has a test-optional standardized testing policy. Applicants to American may submit SAT or ACT scores to the school, but they are not required. During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, 52% of admitted students submitted SAT scores. SAT Range (Admitted Students) Section 25th Percentile 75th Percentile ERW 630 700 Math 590 680 ERW=Evidence-Based Reading and Writing This admissions data tells us that of those students who submitted scores during the 2017-18 admissions cycle, most of American Universitys admitted students fall within the top 20% nationally on the SAT. For the evidence-based reading and writing section, 50% of students admitted to American University scored between 630 and 700, while 25% scored below 630 and 25% scored above 700. On the math section, 50% of admitted students scored between 590 and 680, while 25% scored below 590 and 25% scored above 680. While the SAT is not required, this data tells us that a composite SAT score of 1380 or higher is competitive for American University. Requirements American University does not require SAT scores for admission. For students who choose to submit scores, note that American participates in the scorechoice program, meaning that the admissions office will consider your highest score from each individual section across all SAT test dates. American University does not consider the essay section of the SAT. ACT Scores and Requirements American University has a test-optional standardized testing policy. Applicants to American may submit SAT or ACT scores to the school, but they are not required. During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, 36% of admitted students submitted ACT scores. ACT Range (Admitted Students) Section 25th Percentile 75th Percentile English 27 34 Math 24 29 Composite 27 31 This admissions data tells us that of those who submitted scores during the 2017-18 admissions cycle, most of American Universitys admitted students fall within the top 14% nationally on the ACT. The middle 50% of students admitted to American University received a composite ACT score between 27 and 31, while 25% scored above 31 and 25% scored below 27. Requirements American University does not require ACT scores for admission. For students who choose to submit scores, note that American participates in the scorechoice program, meaning that the admissions office will consider your highest score from each individual section across all ACT test dates. American University does not consider the ACT writing section. GPA In 2018, the middle 50% of American Universitys incoming class had high school GPAs between 3.52 and 4.06, and an average GPA of 3.65. Nearly 65% of admitted students had average GPAs above 3.5. These results suggest that most successful applicants to American University have primarily A grades. Self-Reported GPA/SAT/ACT Graph American University Applicants Self-Reported GPA/SAT/ACT Graph. Data courtesy of Cappex. The admissions data in the graph is self-reported by applicants to American University. GPAs are unweighted. Find out how you compare to accepted students, see the real-time graph, and calculate your chances of getting in  with a free Cappex account. Admissions Chances American University, which accepts fewer than a third of applicants, is selective. However, American which has a holistic admissions process and is test-optional, makes admissions decisions based on much more than numbers.  A strong  application essay, engaging short answer response,  and glowing  letters of recommendation  can strengthen your application, as can participation in meaningful  extracurricular activities  and a  rigorous course schedule.  Applicants should also consider including the optional statement of interest essay on the Common Application. Students with particularly compelling stories or achievements can still receive serious consideration even if their grades are outside of Americans average range. Students interested in American University can apply using either the  Common Application  or the  Coalition Application. American has an  Early Decision program that can improve admission chances for students who are sure the school is their top choice. In the scattergram above, the blue and green dots represent accepted students. You can see that the majority of successful applicants had high school averages of B or higher, combined SAT scores of 1100 or higher (ERWM), and ACT composite scores of 23 or better. Your chances are best if your GPA is up in the A range. Note that test scores will not be used for the admissions decision if applicants choose Americans test-optional application option. If You Like American University, You May Also Like These Schools Boston College,  George Mason University, Northwestern University, and  George Washington University. All admissions data has been sourced from the National Center for Education Statistics and American University Undergraduate Admissions Office.

The Cold War And The Soviet Union - 1710 Words

In 1945, the United States and the Soviet Union were allies, jointly triumphant in World War II, which ended with total victory for Soviet and American forces over Adolf Hitler s Nazi empire in Europe. However, within just a few years, wartime allies became mortal enemies, locked in a global struggle: military, political, economic, and ideological, to prevail in a new Cold War. The Cold War was a time of extreme tension between the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), or the Soviet Union and the United States, and their respective ideologies. It was not declared in the same sense as most wars, rather it progressed over time. Therefore there are different opinions on the exact beginning of the War. Some say the Cold War really†¦show more content†¦There was additionally an apprehension that the others belief system was a danger to their own specific manner of life, and that the main path for the two sides to be happy was for their philosophy to assume control over the world. Given the rationalistic perspective that the entire world must be driven down the way of transformation, the strife between the Soviet government and the whole Western World particularly the USA was unavoidable, the whole structure of Marxism was antagonistic to the conventions of Western methods of insight of opportunity. The aims of these two nations post World War II also aroused strong detestment from both parties. When you look at the events post WWII you see that America sought to eliminate trade barriers both to create markets for American agricultural and industrial products, and to ensure the ability of West European nations to export as a means to generate economic growth and rebuild their economies. The Soviet Union on the other hand was looking to control Europe and protect itself from being invaded by creating a buffer zone. After the war, Greece was in political and economical crisis due to the German occupation and the highly polarized struggle between leftists and rightists which targeted the power vacuum and led to the Greek Civil War, one of the first conflicts of the

Bystanders in Situations of Bullying Motivations for...

Introduction/Background Bullying can be experienced in several forms such as physical, verbal, social or cyber. All bullying is composed of three specific concepts—causing their victims harm, possessing greater power than their victims and repetition (Oh Hazler, 2009). Bystanders play perhaps the most vital role in bullying (Oh Hazler, 2009). Bystanders can help the bully (‘assistants’ or ‘reinforcers’), remain passive and non-interceptive (‘outsiders’) or they can be ‘defenders’, which are individuals who intervene using prosocial behaviours, meaning that they voluntarily act in ways that benefit others (Oh Hazler, 2009; Thornberg, 2007). Statistics suggest bystander’s use only 25% of their time to intervene and defend the bully†¦show more content†¦Recent studies that have analyzed the behaviour of bystanders, in situations of bullying, have put a large emphasis on the predictors of bystander actions and the reasons why they are passive in such situations. Predictors such as gender, grade, past experiences with bullying, type of bullying witnessed and friendship dynamics have displayed some significant trends in the reactions of bystanders (Oh Hazler, 2009; Trach, Hymel, Waterhouse and Neale, 2010). For example, researchers identify strong and consistent trends that indicate girls are more likely to support victims with positive actions (Oh Hazler, 2009; Trach, Hymel, Waterhouse and Neale, 2010). The purpose of this study is contrary to previous studies and will take a particular interest in the motivations for prosocial behaviour in terms of direct or indirect intervention. Bystanders who take a direct intervention approach often intervene by discouraging the bully, helping the victim, or redirecting the situation, whereas those who use indirect intervention report the bullying to an adult or teacher, talk to a friend, or get other bystanders to help (Trach, Hymel, Waterhouse N eale, 2010). However, it is interesting to consider that the intervention approach bystanders chose to take will be influenced by the policies, responses to victims and peerShow MoreRelatedBully5482 Words   |  22 Pages------------------------------------------------- Bullying From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For the Wikipedia guidance essay, see  Wikipedia:WikiBullying Bullying is detrimental to students’ well-being and development.[1] Bullying  is the use of force or  coercion  to  abuse  or  intimidate  others. The behavior can be habitual and involve an imbalance of social or physical  power. It can include verbal  harassment  or  threat, physical  assault  or coercion and may be directed repeatedly towards particular victims, perhaps on groundsRead MoreHalimbawa Ng Term Paper6581 Words   |  27 PagesDON SERVILLANO PLATON MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL Sta. Cruz Tinambac Camarines Sur S/Y 2012-2013 The Effect of Bullying In The School to Students of Don Servillano Platon Memorial High School Janice Tamayo Inocencio (Researcher) Mrs. Adelaida Espejo (English Professor) Acknowledgements I would like to express my deepest gratitude to the special people who have extended their assistance for the

How effectively the constitution protects freedom free essay sample

There is a small amount of disagreement over whether or not the US constitution protects freedom for the average American citizen – whilst many Americans feel that the constitution formally protects their liberties (for example: the first amendment guarantees the rights of Americans to their freedom of speech) others believe that the codified constitution is unnecessary and would point to nations like the United Kingdom (that do not have a codified constitution) that operate reasonably efficiently and have other methods of protecting the rights of the average person. Those that identify themselves as more traditionalist in the United States would argue that constitution has served to protect the rights of individuals to a satisfactory standard during its centuries of operation. They would use the notion of ‘conservative pragmatism’ to suggest that the historical democratic system in place is functioning well and so does not require change. Those that consider themselves more willing to reform the American system would disagree with this and would point to several historical issues that suggest the current system has not protected freedom properly. Over the years various groups have been discriminated against – including Native Americans and African-Americans, despite the amendments to the constitution and the principles of the self-governing system that the United States of America was founded on. There is disagreement over the constitution’s protection of the rights of minority populations (such as African-Americans) in the past. Some would argue that despite the 15th Amendment (signed in 1870) granting the right to all Americans to vote regardless of race or colour, African-Americans continued to be discriminated against for nearly a hundred years. Indeed some polling stations used literacy tests to discriminate against African-Americans up until the 1960s – giving white people easy questions and then giving African-Americans considerably harder tests (one in Louisiana was described as ‘impossible’ by judges on the Supreme Court in 1965) simply to allow them to vote. Some would point to this discrimination as a failure of the American constitution to adequately protect the freedoms of the American people, and would argue that the rights of some African-American voters were better protected by the Supreme Court and President Lyndon B. Johnson. However, others would argue that the discrimination experienced by those African-Americans was produced by a racist minority manipulating the system unfairly – and would point out that the literacy tests were deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court and so the rights of all were protected by the constitution’s system of checks and balances, and the separation of powers. So the discrimination was a result of a minority acting illegally and was corrected by the processes outlined in the constitution. The existence of disagreement over the American constitution’s ability to protect the liberties of the American people is evident in the amendments to the document that have been proposed. A Federal Marriage Amendment (which would make same-sex marriage legal in every state) has been proposed on four occasions in this century but has been defeated every time so far. With the issue of same-sex marriage being separate from this debate, the fact that some Americans feel the need to propose such an amendment clearly suggests there is huge disagreement over the ability of the constitution to protect their rights in its present form. There are other amendments that have been proposed – such as the Right to Vote Amendment and the People’s Rights Amendment that have been unsuccessful in reforming the system but do demonstrate the presence of disagreement over the efficacy of the American constitution. On the other hand the fact that there has not been a successful amendment of the constitution since 1992 (the 27th amendment) suggests that there is no longer much of a debate over the needs to amend the constitution and therefore the majority of Americans believe that their constitution is protecting their rights satisfactorily. However, simply because there has not been a successful amendment in recent years does not mean there has not been any disagreement over the ability of the constitution’s ability to defend the liberties of the American people. The fact is that in a developed, civilized, democratic nation like the United States there will always be debate over necessary reforms and so there is and always will be disagreement over how effectively the constitution protects freedom. Furthermore, the majority of Americans feel the system laid out by the constitution does sufficiently protect their rights sufficiently. Although the constitution does have its flaws (for example it does not even explicitly mention the rights of the people to vote) it does perpetuate a system that protects the rights of the citizens based on prevailing public opinion – which is more democratic than an outlining of eternal liberties. The fact that the constitution outlines the separation of powers (to the executive, legislature and judiciary) ensures no one body can amass too much power and exploit the rights of the people. Dare I say it but even the Second Amendment – the Right to Bear Arms, allows the people to protect themselves from a tyrannical government and thus protect their rights from central government and other potential oppressors. The use of an impartial judiciary with the ability to check the elected positions in the legislature and executive helps to prevent the often feared ‘tyranny of the majority’ – and protects the rights of the minorities without undermining democracy. Even the process of constitutional amendments allows certain rights to be created through a democratic process and allows a more autonomous system that can react to popular demand whilst still protecting established rights. It would require a united, single-party or combined oppressive politicians to dominate over 38 of the 50 states for a party to begin to abuse the rights of the people and make the required amendments to the constitution as well as a two thirds majority in both houses and potentially the control of the executive to appoint sympathetic judges to the Supreme Court (with the confirmation of the Senate). Realistically most Americans know that this is incredibly unlikely and almost everyone accepts that the two-party system that the constitution encourages prevents any one group from dominating the political process to the extent that the rights of the people would be threatened. With the growth of the executive position and power, and the influence of the federal bureaucracy in the decision making process some American people feel that the government and unelected officials are able to breach the will of the people. The fact that the US government has gone to war on numerous occasions without the approval of congress (which the constitution states is required) using various loopholes – for example when the US sent troops into Korea they used the excuse of a peace-keeping mission, similar excuses were used for interventions in Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam – with all conflicts not being approved by the legislature. This worries many Americans and recent protests after interventions in the middle east has led to many calling for reform to the system in place to go to war and intervene militarily in other countries. The existence of the Iraq War protests (such as the ones in Washington D. C. in 2007) implies there is disagreement over the constitution’s system of declaring war and suggesting some people believe the rights of the people are being violated as the US government can declare war on other countries without going through the democratic processes. In conclusion, there is a small amount of disagreement over whether or not the constitution protects the freedom of the people. This is evident from the proposed amendments, concerns among the American people about governance and historical examples of the government abusing the liberties of some citizens. Despite the lack of recent amendments and general consensus that the constitution is not completely unfit for purpose, there is still disagreement over the efficacy of the American constitution in protecting freedom and the liberties of the American people.